Medlin v. State
102 S.E. 826, 150 Ga. 119, 1920 Ga. LEXIS 74
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Medlin v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 149 Ga. 23 →
Opinion
There was no abuse of discretion on the part of the trial court in overruling the extraordinary motion for a new trial, based upon newly discovered evidence. Norman v. Goode, 121 Ga. 449 (49 S. E. 268).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Medlin v. State, 102 S.E. 826, 150 Ga. 119, 1920 Ga. LEXIS 74 (Ga. 1920).
102 S.E. 826 (Medlin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Norman v. Goode
49 S.E. 268 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1904)