Medlin v. State

102 S.E. 826, 150 Ga. 119, 1920 Ga. LEXIS 74
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Medlin v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 149 Ga. 23
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided April 15, 1920·No. No. 1615·Published

Opinion

Beck, P. J.

There was no abuse of discretion on the part of the trial court in overruling the extraordinary motion for a new trial, based upon newly discovered evidence. Norman v. Goode, 121 Ga. 449 (49 S. E. 268).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Gilbert, J., absent for providential cause.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Medlin v. State, 102 S.E. 826, 150 Ga. 119, 1920 Ga. LEXIS 74 (Ga. 1920).

102 S.E. 826 (Medlin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Norman v. Goode
49 S.E. 268 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1904)