Medley v. Terrangi

Fourth Circuit

Medley v. Terrangi

79 F. App'x 580

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 29, 2003·No. No. 03-6683·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Vincent DePaul Medley appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Medley v. Terrangi, No. CA-03-224-2 (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 17, 2003 & entered Apr. 18, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Vincent DePaul Medley appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Medley v. Terrangi, No. CA-03-224-2 (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 17, 2003 & entered Apr. 18, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Medley v. Terrangi, 79 F. App'x 580 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

79 F. App'x 580 (Medley v. Terrangi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related