Medley v. Runnels

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Medley v. Runnels. Read the opinion of the Court — 506 F.3d 857
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided April 30, 2007·No. 05-55295·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

THEODORE BEECH MEDLEY,  No. 05-55295 Petitioner-Appellant, v.  D.C. No. CV-03-01509-LGB D. L. RUNNELS, Warden, ORDER Respondent-Appellee.  Filed April 30, 2007

Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Chief Judge.

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three- judge panel unpublished disposition shall not be cited as pre- cedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

4827 PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2007 Thomson/West.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Medley v. Runnels, (9th Cir. 2007).

Medley v. Runnels (Medley v. Runnels) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.