Medley v. Medley

Supreme Court of Virginia

Medley v. Medley

3 Va. 191

DecidedOctober 9, 1811

StatusPublished

This text of 3 Va. 191 (Medley v. Medley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Medley v. Medley, 3 Va. 191 (Va. 1811).

Pincite

Opinion

The Court, after taking time to consider the point, decidéd that the appeal had not abated, and that the cause might be called for trial5 saving to the appellant the liberty to move far security for costs; as to the propriety of which, no opinion was then given.*

Note. Ik tins ease ko motion for security for costs was made; and the fmlgment was afterwards affirmed without it. See Carter v. Washington and others, 0 fl and PL 5x. aud .Purvis v Hill, Ibid. 614; from which ¡eases it appears ih&t security fox* costs, if required, must be given; but it h not erre? to proceed without it, if not required.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court, after taking time to consider the point, decidéd that the appeal had not abated, and that the cause might be called for trial5 saving to the appellant the liberty to move far security for costs; as to the propriety of which, no opinion was then given.*

Note. Ik tins ease ko motion for security for costs was made; and the fmlgment was afterwards affirmed without it. See Carter v. Washington and others, 0 fl and PL 5x. aud .Purvis v Hill, Ibid. 614; from which ¡eases it appears ih&t security fox* costs, if required, must be given; but it h not erre? to proceed without it, if not required.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Va. 191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/medley-v-medley-va-1811.