Medley Hardwoods, Inc. v. Rojas

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Medley Hardwoods, Inc. v. Rojas

4 So. 3d 1270, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2522, 2009 WL 779842

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 26, 2009

Docket1D09-0274

StatusPublished

This text of 4 So. 3d 1270 (Medley Hardwoods, Inc. v. Rojas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Medley Hardwoods, Inc. v. Rojas, 4 So. 3d 1270, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2522, 2009 WL 779842 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of Petitioners’ response to this court’s January 26, 2009, order to show cause, the Petition for Writ of Certiorari is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Caldwell v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 980 So.2d 1226 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) (noting Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.100(c)(1) provides that a petition for writ of certiorari shall be filed within thirty days of the date of rendition of the order, and the time for seeking certiorari review is jurisdictional). The instant petition was filed on January 12, 2009. However, because the order being challenged was rendered on December 10, 2008, the petition was required to be filed by January 9, 2009.

DISMISSED.

ALLEN, VAN NORTWICK and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of Petitioners’ response to this court’s January 26, 2009, order to show cause, the Petition for Writ of Certiorari is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Caldwell v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 980 So.2d 1226 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) (noting Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.100(c)(1) provides that a petition for writ of certiorari shall be filed within thirty days of the date of rendition of the order, and the time for seeking certiorari review is jurisdictional). The instant petition was filed on January 12, 2009. However, because the order being challenged was rendered on December 10, 2008, the petition was required to be filed by January 9, 2009.

DISMISSED.

ALLEN, VAN NORTWICK and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 So. 3d 1270, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2522, 2009 WL 779842, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/medley-hardwoods-inc-v-rojas-fladistctapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack