Mediterranean Corp. v. Pappas
This text of 146 So. 106 (Mediterranean Corp. v. Pappas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
This is a companion ease to that of A. W. Kurz v. D. Pappas, and others, recently considered by us, 146 So. 100, 147 So. 271. Both cases were argued together. Both are appeals from final decrees. Each is controlled by the principles of law and equity heretofore laid down in Sandquist & Snow, Inc. v. Kellogg, 101 Fla. 568,133 Sou. Rep. 65, 101 Fla. 579, 136 Sou. Rep. 235.
In the instant ease the right to a priority in the property involved, as between appellant, a mortgage assignee, and the owner of the fee, one Patehen, a subsequent grantee under the purchaser at a mechanic’s lien foreclosure, was litigated. The master held, and the Chancellor sustained his ruling, that under the evidence submitted, the adjudicated lien for labor and materials under which appellee claimed, accrued prior to the date of the mortgage. Foreclosure of the mortgage as against the mechanic’s lien was denied and the bill of complaint was ordered dismissed without prejudice to- any other right of the mortgage holder.
The ruling should be affirmed on the authority of the companion case to this, decided at the present term.
Affirmed.'
Piled under Rule 21-A.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
146 So. 106, 107 Fla. 876, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mediterranean-corp-v-pappas-fla-1933.