Mediterranean Corp. v. Pappas
Opinions
This is a companion ease to that of A. W. Kurz v. D. Pappas, and others, recently considered by us, 146 So. 100, 147 So. 271. Both cases were argued together. Both are appeals from final decrees. Each is controlled by the principles of law and equity heretofore laid down in Sandquist & Snow, Inc. v. Kellogg, 101 Fla. 568,133 Sou. Rep. 65, 101 Fla. 579, 136 Sou. Rep. 235.
In the instant ease the right to a priority in the property involved, as between appellant, a mortgage assignee, and the owner of the fee, one Patehen, a subsequent grantee under the purchaser at a mechanic’s lien foreclosure, was litigated. The master held, and the Chancellor sustained his ruling, that under the evidence submitted, the adjudicated lien for labor and materials under which appellee claimed, accrued prior to the date of the mortgage. Foreclosure of the mortgage as against the mechanic’s lien was denied and the bill of complaint was ordered dismissed without prejudice to- any other right of the mortgage holder.
The ruling should be affirmed on the authority of the companion case to this, decided at the present term.
Affirmed.'
Piled under Rule 21-A.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
146 So. 106 (Mediterranean Corp. v. Pappas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.