Medina v. The City of New York
Opinion
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ZAHIRA MEDINA,
Plaintiff,
-v- CIVIL ACTION NO.: 20 Civ. 797 (VEC) (SLC)
CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., ORDER
Defendants.
SARAH L. CAVE, United States Magistrate Judge. On June 20, 2021, the Honorable Valerie E. Caproni issued an amended order of reference, referring this action to the undersigned for an inquest after default/damages hearing. (ECF No. 62). Plaintiff seeks an award of “$158,264.05 plus post-judgment interest,” including $150,000 for loss of liberty and emotional distress, and $6,986 in lost wages. (ECF No. 61 at 14– 16). Although Plaintiff’s declaration states her rate of pay, Plaintiff does not provide any supporting documentation (for example, pay stubs or tax forms) to substantiate her alleged damages. (ECF Nos. 60, 60-1 – 60-4).1 See Dunn v. Advanced Credit Recovery Inc., No. 11 Civ. 4023 (PAE) (JLC), 2012 WL 676350, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 1, 2012) (noting that a plaintiff “bears the burden of establishing [its] entitlement to recovery and thus must substantiate [its] claim with evidence to prove the extent of damages.”)). Accordingly, to the extent Plaintiff continues to seek damages for lost wages, she must submit additional documentation by Friday, September 24, 2021.
Dated: New York, New York September 10, 2021
1 The documents attached to counsel’s declaration in support of the inquest include Plaintiff’s declaration (ECF No. 60-1); a “replacement Bill of Sale for [Plaintiff’s] vehicle purchased from Defendant Gordon’s SO ORDERED.
( a L. Ue nited States Magistrate Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Medina v. The City of New York (Medina v. The City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.