Medina v. Stinson
This text of 251 A.D.2d 935 (Medina v. Stinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Washington County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner was found guilty of violating prison disciplinary rules which prohibit inmates from fighting and engaging in violent conduct in a group. The misbehavior report, the videotape of the incident and the testimony of the correction officer who observed petitioner participating in a melee in the prison yard provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see, Matter of Collazo v Coombe, 235 AD2d 654; Matter of Ruffin v Coombe, 233 AD2d 729). Petitioner’s exculpatory testimony merely created a credibility issue which the Hearing Officer was entitled to resolve against him (see, Matter of Rodriquez v Coombe, 238 AD2d 691, 692). We have reviewed petitioner’s remaining contentions — including that the misbehavior report was deficient and that the Hearing Officer was biased — and find them to be either unpreserved for our review or lacking in merit.
[936]*936Mercure, J. P., Yesawich Jr., Spain, Carpinello and Graffeo, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
251 A.D.2d 935, 674 N.Y.S.2d 860, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7760, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/medina-v-stinson-nyappdiv-1998.