Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Medina v. State

Medina v. State

767 So. 2d 1265, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 12360, 2000 WL 1397913
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Medina v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 758 So. 2d 113 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 27, 2000·No. No. 3D99-2953·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

There is no merit in the appellant’s contentions which challenge his conviction and sentence for the sale of cocaine. In accordance with the oral pronouncement of the trial court and agreement of the state and defense counsel, however, the judgment [1266]*1266and sentence for possession of cocaine are vacated.

Affirmed in part, vacated in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Medina v. State, 767 So. 2d 1265, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 12360, 2000 WL 1397913 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

767 So. 2d 1265 (Medina v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.