Medina v. Figueroa

16 A.D.3d 420, 790 N.Y.S.2d 401, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2287
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 7, 2005·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

— In related proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act articles 6 and 8, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County (Sammarco, J.), dated February 27, 2004, which, inter alia, dismissed her petitions. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), in which he moves to be relieved of the assignment to prosecute this appeal.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the mother’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on her appeal. Thus, counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted (cf. Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]). H. Miller, J.P., Cozier, S. Miller and Fisher, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Medina v. Figueroa, 16 A.D.3d 420, 790 N.Y.S.2d 401, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2287 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

16 A.D.3d 420 (Medina v. Figueroa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Randolph v. Nevels
50 A.D.3d 691 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Diplan v. Diplan
37 A.D.3d 828 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)