Medina v. Donnelly
764 N.E.2d 388, 97 N.Y.2d 672, 738 N.Y.S.2d 285, 2001 N.Y. LEXIS 3812
This text of 764 N.E.2d 388 (Medina v. Donnelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Medina v. Donnelly, 764 N.E.2d 388, 97 N.Y.2d 672, 738 N.Y.S.2d 285, 2001 N.Y. LEXIS 3812 (N.Y. 2001).
Opinion
[673]*673OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, without costs. The Appellate Division correctly determined that the instant proceeding was moot.
Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley, Rosenblatt and Graffeo.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
764 N.E.2d 388, 97 N.Y.2d 672, 738 N.Y.S.2d 285, 2001 N.Y. LEXIS 3812, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/medina-v-donnelly-ny-2001.