Medina v. Bronx-Lebanon Hospital Center

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Medina v. Bronx-Lebanon Hospital Center

254 A.D.2d 25, 678 N.Y.S.2d 260, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9930

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 1, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 254 A.D.2d 25 (Medina v. Bronx-Lebanon Hospital Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Medina v. Bronx-Lebanon Hospital Center, 254 A.D.2d 25, 678 N.Y.S.2d 260, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9930 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard Silver, J.), entered January 17, 1997, which granted defendants-appellants’ motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to comply with prior orders directing a further bill of particulars and further expert disclosure “only to the extent of precluding plaintiff” unless she serves a further bill of particulars and further expert disclosure in compliance with the prior orders within 30 days of the co-defendants’ depositions, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The order on appeal appropriately balances defendants’ disclosure demands and plaintiff’s prompt and good faith ef[26]*26forts to comply with prior orders. Concur — Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Ellerin and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard Silver, J.), entered January 17, 1997, which granted defendants-appellants’ motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to comply with prior orders directing a further bill of particulars and further expert disclosure “only to the extent of precluding plaintiff” unless she serves a further bill of particulars and further expert disclosure in compliance with the prior orders within 30 days of the co-defendants’ depositions, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The order on appeal appropriately balances defendants’ disclosure demands and plaintiff’s prompt and good faith ef[26]*26forts to comply with prior orders. Concur — Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Ellerin and Andrias, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

254 A.D.2d 25, 678 N.Y.S.2d 260, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9930, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/medina-v-bronx-lebanon-hospital-center-nyappdiv-1998.