Medina v. All American Bus Lines, Inc.

152 F.2d 61, 1945 U.S. App. LEXIS 2235
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided November 29, 1945·No. No. 11462·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.

The suit was for damages for injuries resulting in death. The claim was that plaintiff’s decedent had come to his death as a result of the negligent operation of defendant’s bus. At the conclusion of plaintiff’s evidence, a motion for directed verdict was made and granted. Plaintiff is here insisting that, though the evidence was entirely circumstantial, it was sufficient to make an issue for the jury. Appellee insists that the evidence shows no more than that there was an accident, and that under settled law the proof that an accident occurred is not proof that it was negligently caused.1 It insists further that while negligence may be proved by circumstantial evidence, the authorities 2 settle it that the circumstances must be such that an inference of negligence is not purely speculative in its nature.

We agree with appellee’s statement of the law, and a page by page search of the record leaves in no doubt that the evidence showed no more than that a collision occurred, its causes completely unexplained. In this state of the record, a directed verdict for defendant was demanded. The judgment was right. It is affirmed.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Medina v. All American Bus Lines, Inc., 152 F.2d 61, 1945 U.S. App. LEXIS 2235 (5th Cir. 1945).

152 F.2d 61 (Medina v. All American Bus Lines, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Davis v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.
196 F. Supp. 407 (N.D. California, 1961)
Dill v. Scuka
175 F. Supp. 26 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1959)
De Jean v. Great American Indemnity Co.
126 F. Supp. 931 (W.D. Louisiana, 1954)
Cie. Des Messageries Maritimes v. Tawes
205 F.2d 5 (Fifth Circuit, 1953)