Medina v. 203 West 109th Street Realty Corp.

16 A.D.3d 220, 790 N.Y.S.2d 663, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2491
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 2005·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Janice L. Bowman, J.), entered on or about January 7, 2004, which, to the extent appealed from, denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff seeks recovery for personal injuries sustained when she fell in her bathroom while attempting to escape a jet of hot water from the showerhead. There are triable issues of fact, including whether defendant had notice of the allegedly defective condition of the sink which gave way and whether such defect was a proximate cause of the accident (Weisbart v Hudson Manor Terrace Corp., 299 AD2d 160 [2002]). Furthermore, the parties’ submissions present issues of witness credibility that cannot be resolved on a motion for summary judgment (Santos v Temco Serv. Indus., 295 AD2d 218 [2002]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Marlow, Sullivan, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Medina v. 203 West 109th Street Realty Corp., 16 A.D.3d 220, 790 N.Y.S.2d 663, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2491 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

16 A.D.3d 220 (Medina v. 203 West 109th Street Realty Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Moe-Salley v. Highbridge House Ogden, LLC
185 N.Y.S.3d 230 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
Oi Tai Chan v. Society of Shaolin Temple, Inc.
30 Misc. 3d 244 (New York Supreme Court, 2010)
Powell v. HIS Contractors, Inc.
75 A.D.3d 463 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)