MEDINA-OCHOA
This text of 12 I. & N. Dec. 547 (MEDINA-OCHOA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Board of Immigration Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Interim Decision *1820
'MATTER OF MEDINA-OCEOA
In Exclusion Proceedings
A-17384381-2
Decided by Board December 13, 1967 Applicants, natives and citizens of M0Y100, who Ara ("timing to the United States for the purpose of demolishing a house that had been given them and taking the salvageable lumber back to Mexico to use in building homes for themselves, who will not be paid and will use no local labor in the operation, are admissible as nonimmigrant visitors for business within the purview of section 101(a) (15) (B), Immigration and Nationality Act. Ex°Lunen's: Act of 1952—Section 212(a) (20) [8 U.S.C. 1182 (a) (20)] —Immigrants without visas.
The cases are before us by certification. The special inquiry officer ordered applicants excluded as immigrants not in possession of the appropriate documents. We find applicants admissible as non- immigrants. The applicants, Jose and his younger brother, Jesus, natives and citizens of Mexico, applied for admission on October 18, 1967 at San Ysidxo, California as nonimmigrants for business. They stated they had been given a house at Long Beach, California by the owner, that they intended to demolish it, take the debris to the local dump, and take the salvageable lumber back to Mexico where they planned to build homes for themselves. The applicants will demolish the building without the use of local labor and will transport the material in a truck belonging to Jesus. They will not be paid. This is the first venture of this type and applicants have no plans to engage in others. They expect to do the job in about six days and plan on making two trips to take all the material to Mexico. Both applicants are farmers; one does some carpentry also. The special inquiry officer held that the applicants' sole and princi- pal purpose is to perform labor in the United States in competition with the local labor market. We however find that the primary purpose is to enter the United States to take back to Mexico property which
547 Interim Decision #1820 has been given to them. The cases are similar to that in Matter of Cortez-Vasguez, 10 I. & N. Dec. 544, in which we found a Mexican national who entered the United States to collect wood on American ranchs for disposition in Mexico was admissible as a nonimmigrant visitor for business. ORDER: It is ordered that the decision of October 19, 1967 of the special inquiry officer be reversed and that the applicants be found admissible as nonimmigrant visitors for business.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
12 I. & N. Dec. 547, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/medina-ochoa-bia-1967.