Medina-Lara v. Holder

Ninth Circuit

Medina-Lara v. Holder

767 F.3d 801, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 16483, 2014 WL 4187396

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedAugust 25, 2014

Docket13-70491

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 767 F.3d 801 (Medina-Lara v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Medina-Lara v. Holder, 767 F.3d 801, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 16483, 2014 WL 4187396 (9th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

For reasons to be set forth in a disposition which will follow in due course, we grant Medina-Lara’s petition for review because the government did not meet its burden to show that his California convictions constitute predicate offenses for purposes of removability under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2). We, therefore, order the United States to release Medina-Lara from custody immediately.

SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

For reasons to be set forth in a disposition which will follow in due course, we grant Medina-Lara’s petition for review because the government did not meet its burden to show that his California convictions constitute predicate offenses for purposes of removability under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2). We, therefore, order the United States to release Medina-Lara from custody immediately.

SO ORDERED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

767 F.3d 801, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 16483, 2014 WL 4187396, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/medina-lara-v-holder-ca9-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack