Medina-Lara v. Holder

Ninth Circuit

Medina-Lara v. Holder

767 F.3d 801, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 16483, 2014 WL 4187396

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 25, 2014·No. 13-70491·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

For reasons to be set forth in a disposition which will follow in due course, we grant Medina-Lara’s petition for review because the government did not meet its burden to show that his California convictions constitute predicate offenses for purposes of removability under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2). We, therefore, order the United States to release Medina-Lara from custody immediately.

SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

For reasons to be set forth in a disposition which will follow in due course, we grant Medina-Lara’s petition for review because the government did not meet its burden to show that his California convictions constitute predicate offenses for purposes of removability under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2). We, therefore, order the United States to release Medina-Lara from custody immediately.

SO ORDERED.

Medina-Lara v. Holder, 767 F.3d 801, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 16483, 2014 WL 4187396 (9th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

767 F.3d 801 (Medina-Lara v. Holder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related