Medina County Bar Ass'n v. Haddad
This text of 385 N.E.2d 294 (Medina County Bar Ass'n v. Haddad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The sole issue before this court is whether respondent should receive the indefinite suspension recommended by the board or the permanent disbarment requested by relator.
In Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Fatica (1971), 28 Ohio St. 2d 40, this court permanently disbarred an attorney convicted of soliciting and accepting a bribe. We find the Cleveland case to control this one. Society’s confidence in those oc[12]*12cupying positions of public trust, including members of the bar who are officers of the court, is seriously undermined when a person in that position either accepts or gives a bribe. We therefore rule that respondent be permanently disbarred from the practice of law.
Judgment accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
385 N.E.2d 294, 57 Ohio St. 2d 11, 11 Ohio Op. 3d 73, 1979 Ohio LEXIS 356, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/medina-county-bar-assn-v-haddad-ohio-1979.