Medigroup Inc. v. Fisher

87 A.D.2d 837, 449 N.Y.S.2d 264, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16305
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 12, 1982
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 87 A.D.2d 837 (Medigroup Inc. v. Fisher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Medigroup Inc. v. Fisher, 87 A.D.2d 837, 449 N.Y.S.2d 264, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16305 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

In a breach of contract action, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kelly, J.), dated January 27, 1981, which denied his motion to vacate an arbitration award of $1,000. Order reversed, with $50 costs and disbursements, and case remitted to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, for a hearing to determine whether defendant can demonstrate good cause for vacating the arbitration award entered against him, pursuant to 22 NYCRR 28.7 (a). We hold Special Term was in error in applying CPLR 7511. While CPLR 7511 applies to the vacating and modifying of an arbitration award, it applies only when the parties have a written agreement providing for arbitration. In the case at bar the agreement dated January 3,1978 does not contain a written provision to submit any controversy to arbitration; thus CPLR 7511 is not applicable. 22 NYCRR 28.2 (b) empowers the Supreme Court to transfer to the Arbitration Calendar actions such as the instant matter. 22 NYCRR 28.7 (a) provides for vacating the arbitration award where a party fails to appear at the hearing and restoring it to the Arbitration Calendar upon demonstrating “good cause”. Thus, since Special Term did not reach the issue of whether defendant had demonstrated good cause under 22 NYCRR 28.7 (a), this action should be remitted to Special Term to determine whether defendant has established good cause for his failure to appear at the hearing, so as to permit the restoration of the action to the Arbitration Calendar. Thompson, J. P., Brown, Niehoff and Boyers, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cable Films v. Ampro Video Productions, Inc.
125 Misc. 2d 874 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
87 A.D.2d 837, 449 N.Y.S.2d 264, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16305, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/medigroup-inc-v-fisher-nyappdiv-1982.