Medical Liability Mutual Insurance v. Schurig

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Medical Liability Mutual Insurance v. Schurig

211 A.D.2d 518, 621 N.Y.S.2d 564, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 377

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 19, 1995

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 211 A.D.2d 518 (Medical Liability Mutual Insurance v. Schurig) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Medical Liability Mutual Insurance v. Schurig, 211 A.D.2d 518, 621 N.Y.S.2d 564, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 377 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Fingerhood, J.), entered September 28, 1993, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The same public policy considerations that prohibit an insurer from subrogating against its own insured for a claim arising from the very risk for which the insured was covered (see, North Star Reins. Corp. v Continental Ins. Co., 82 NY2d 281, 294-295) necessitate a dismissal of this action, wherein plaintiff insurer seeks to subrogate against its insured’s employee, a nurse, in order to recoup what it paid out in settlement of a medical malpractice action that arose from the same facts as are alleged herein (see, Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v Greater N. Y. Mut. Ins. Co., 205 AD2d 433; Fireman’s Ins. Co. v Wheeler, 165 AD2d 141). Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Ross, Williams and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Fingerhood, J.), entered September 28, 1993, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The same public policy considerations that prohibit an insurer from subrogating against its own insured for a claim arising from the very risk for which the insured was covered (see, North Star Reins. Corp. v Continental Ins. Co., 82 NY2d 281, 294-295) necessitate a dismissal of this action, wherein plaintiff insurer seeks to subrogate against its insured’s employee, a nurse, in order to recoup what it paid out in settlement of a medical malpractice action that arose from the same facts as are alleged herein (see, Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v Greater N. Y. Mut. Ins. Co., 205 AD2d 433; Fireman’s Ins. Co. v Wheeler, 165 AD2d 141). Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Ross, Williams and Tom, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

211 A.D.2d 518, 621 N.Y.S.2d 564, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 377, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/medical-liability-mutual-insurance-v-schurig-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack