Medical & Health Employees v. Klein

218 A.D.2d 788, 631 N.Y.S.2d 176, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9002
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedAugust 28, 1995
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 218 A.D.2d 788 (Medical & Health Employees v. Klein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Medical & Health Employees v. Klein, 218 A.D.2d 788, 631 N.Y.S.2d 176, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9002 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, to recover hospitalization, health, and welfare contributions pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Yachnin, J.), entered September 1, 1994, as (1) denied their motion for partial summary judgment, and (2) granted the defendants’ cross motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) to dismiss the first, second, and fifth causes of action against all of the defendants except Comprehensive Foot Care Group, and the third and fourth causes of action in their entirety.

Ordered that, upon searching the record, the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof which denied so much of the cross motion of the defendant Comprehensive Foot Care Group as sought summary judgment dismissing the first, second, and fifth causes of action insofar as asserted against it, and substituting therefor a provision granting the cross motion dismissing the complaint in its entirety; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, [789]*789without prejudice to any existing rights of the parties to proceed to arbitration; and it is further,

Ordered that the defendants are awarded one bill of costs.

The plaintiffs commenced this action to recover unpaid employer contributions and dues checks-offs pursuant to, inter alia, a collective bargaining agreement (hereinafter the agreement). As signatories to the agreement, all of the parties, including Comprehensive Foot Care Group, are bound by the mandatory arbitration clause contained in the agreement. Accordingly, the plaintiffs’ complaint should have been dismissed as against all of the defendants, including Comprehensive Foot Care Group. Rosenblatt, J. P., Altman, Hart and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Digene Corp. v. Ventana Medical Systems, Inc.
316 F. Supp. 2d 174 (D. Delaware, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
218 A.D.2d 788, 631 N.Y.S.2d 176, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9002, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/medical-health-employees-v-klein-nyappdiv-1995.