Medical Discount Pharmacy, L.P., Lifechek Rosenberg GP, Inc., LifeChek, Inc. and Bruce v. Gingrich, Individually v. State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas

Medical Discount Pharmacy, L.P., Lifechek Rosenberg GP, Inc., LifeChek, Inc. and Bruce v. Gingrich, Individually v. State of Texas

DecidedMarch 20, 2014

Docket01-13-00963-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Medical Discount Pharmacy, L.P., Lifechek Rosenberg GP, Inc., LifeChek, Inc. and Bruce v. Gingrich, Individually v. State of Texas (Medical Discount Pharmacy, L.P., Lifechek Rosenberg GP, Inc., LifeChek, Inc. and Bruce v. Gingrich, Individually v. State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Medical Discount Pharmacy, L.P., Lifechek Rosenberg GP, Inc., LifeChek, Inc. and Bruce v. Gingrich, Individually v. State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-13-00963-CV Medical Discount Pharmacy, L.P., LifeChek Rosenberg GP, Inc., Style: LifeChek, Inc., and Bruce V. Gingrich v State of Texas Date motion filed*: March 18, 2014 Type of motion: Motion for extension of time to file the reporter’s record Party filing motion: Court reporter Document to be filed: Reporter’s record

If motion to extend time: Original due date: December 17, 2013 Number of prior extensions: 3 Current Due date: March 19, 2014 Date Requested: April 19, 2014

Ordered that motion is:  Granted in part If document is to be filed, document due:  The Court will not grant additional motions to extend time  Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot) The record was originally due on December 17, 2013. We have granted three extensions for filing the record and have previously stated that no further extensions would be granted. Accordingly, we deny the motion. If the record is not filed within 14 days of the date of this order, we may require the court reporter to appear and show cause why the record has not been filed.

Judge's signature: /s/ Chief Justice Sherry Radack  Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: March 20, 2014

November 7, 2008 Revision

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-13-00963-CV Medical Discount Pharmacy, L.P., LifeChek Rosenberg GP, Inc., Style: LifeChek, Inc., and Bruce V. Gingrich v State of Texas Date motion filed*: March 18, 2014 Type of motion: Motion for extension of time to file the reporter’s record Party filing motion: Court reporter Document to be filed: Reporter’s record

If motion to extend time: Original due date: December 17, 2013 Number of prior extensions: 3 Current Due date: March 19, 2014 Date Requested: April 19, 2014

Ordered that motion is:  Granted in part If document is to be filed, document due:  The Court will not grant additional motions to extend time  Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot) The record was originally due on December 17, 2013. We have granted three extensions for filing the record and have previously stated that no further extensions would be granted. Accordingly, we deny the motion. If the record is not filed within 14 days of the date of this order, we may require the court reporter to appear and show cause why the record has not been filed.

Judge's signature: /s/ Chief Justice Sherry Radack  Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: March 20, 2014

November 7, 2008 Revision

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Medical Discount Pharmacy, L.P., Lifechek Rosenberg GP, Inc., LifeChek, Inc. and Bruce v. Gingrich, Individually v. State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/medical-discount-pharmacy-lp-lifechek-rosenberg-gp-texapp-2014.