Mediatek Inc. v. NXP Semiconductors N.V.

CourtDistrict Court, C.D. California
DecidedMarch 14, 2022
Docket2:21-cv-04969
StatusUnknown

This text of Mediatek Inc. v. NXP Semiconductors N.V. (Mediatek Inc. v. NXP Semiconductors N.V.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, C.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mediatek Inc. v. NXP Semiconductors N.V., (C.D. Cal. 2022).

Opinion

Case 2'21-cv-04969-GW-AFM Document 91 Filed 03/14/22 Page1of40 Page ID #:1667 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MEDIATEK INC. and CASE NO. 2:21-CV-04969-GW- MEDIATEK USA INC., AFMx . STIPULATED PROTECTIVE 13 Plaintiffs, ORDER {PROPOSED} 14 Vv. 15 NXP SEMICONDUCTORS N.V., 16 | NXP USA, INC., 17 || AVNET, INC., ARROW ELECTRONICS, INC., 18 | ROBERT BOSCH GMBH, 19 | ROBERT BOSCH LLC, 50 CONTINENTAL AG, and CONTINENTAL AUTOMOTIVE 21 GMBH, 22 Defendants. 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER [PROPOSED] CASE NO. 2:21-CV-04969-GW-AFM

Case 2:21-cv-04969-GW-AFM Document 91 Filed 03/14/22 Page 2 of 40 Page ID #:1668

1 Plaintiffs and Counterclaim-Defendants MediaTek Inc. and MediaTek USA 2 Inc. (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) and Defendants and Counterclaim-Plaintiffs NXP 3 USA, Inc. and Defendants NXP Semiconductors N.V., Avnet, Inc., Arrow 4 Electronics, Inc., Robert Bosch GmbH and Robert Bosch LLC, and Continental AG 5 and Continental Automotive GmbH (collectively, “Defendants”) anticipate that 6 documents, testimony, and information containing or reflecting confidential, 7 proprietary, trade secret, and/or commercially sensitive information are likely to be 8 disclosed or produced during the course of discovery, initial disclosures, and 9 supplemental disclosures in this case, and request that the Court enter this Order 10 setting forth the conditions for treating, obtaining, and using such information. 11 Pursuant to Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court finds 12 good cause for the following Stipulated Protective Order (“Order” or “Protective 13 Order”): 14 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 15 (a) Protected Material designated under the terms of this Protective Order 16 shall be used by a Receiving Party solely for this case and shall not be used directly 17 or indirectly for any other purpose whatsoever. 18 (b) To the extent that any one of Defendants in this litigation provides 19 Protected Material under the terms of this Protective Order to Plaintiffs, Plaintiffs 20 shall not share that material with the other Defendants in this litigation, absent 21 express written permission from the producing Defendant or an order from the Court. 22 However, Plaintiffs may share materials between Defendants if it is clear that both 23 Defendants have the information, e.g., an email between NXP and Continental that 24 is produced by NXP could be shared with Continental. This Order does not confer 25 any right to any one Defendant to access the Protected Material of any other 26 Defendant that they would not otherwise have access to. 27 28 1

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER [PROPOSED], CASE NO. 2:21-CV-04969-GW-AFM Case 2:21-cv-04969-GW-AFM Document 91 Filed 03/14/22 Page 3 of 40 Page ID #:1669

1 (c) The Parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket 2 protections on all disclosures during discovery, or in the course of making initial or 3 supplemental disclosures under Rule 26(a). Designations under this Order shall be 4 made with care and shall not be made absent a good faith belief that the designated 5 material satisfies the criteria set forth below. If it comes to a Producing Party’s 6 attention that designated material does not qualify for protection at all, or does not 7 qualify for the level of protection initially asserted, the Producing Party must 8 promptly notify all other Parties that it is withdrawing or changing the designation. 9 (d) This Protective Order does not govern the use of confidential 10 information at trial. The use of confidential information at trial shall be governed by 11 orders of the trial judge. 12 2. DEFINITIONS 13 (a) The following definitions apply to terms used in this Order: 14 (i) “Discovery Material” means all items or information, including 15 from any non-party, regardless of the medium or manner generated, stored, or 16 maintained (including, among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible 17 things) that are produced, disclosed, or generated in connection with discovery 18 or Rule 26(a) disclosures in this case. 19 (ii) “Outside Counsel” means (i) outside counsel who appear on the 20 pleadings as counsel for a Party and (ii) partners, associates, paralegals, and 21 staff of such counsel to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose or allow 22 access to the information for this litigation. 23 (iii) “Patents-in-Suit” means U.S. Patent No. 6,738,845, U.S. Patent 24 No. 6,823,451, U.S. Patent No. 8,464,037, U.S. Patent No. 9,265,056, U.S. 25 Patent No. 9,538,531, U.S. Patent No. 10,211,948, U.S. Patent No. 10,278,224, 26 U.S. Patent No. 10,764,874, U.S. Patent No. 9,480,018, U.S. Patent No. 27 10,404,839. 28 2

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER [PROPOSED], CASE NO. 2:21-CV-04969-GW-AFM Case 2:21-cv-04969-GW-AFM Document 91 Filed 03/14/22 Page 4 of 40 Page ID #:1670

1 (iv) “Party” means any party to this case, including all of its officers, 2 directors, employees and their support staffs. 3 (v) “Producing Party” means any Party or non-party that discloses or 4 produces any Discovery Material in this case. 5 (vi) “Protected Material” means any Discovery Material that is 6 designated as “CONFIDENTIAL,” “CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ 7 EYES ONLY,” or “CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES 8 ONLY – SOURCE CODE,” as provided for in this Order. Protected Material 9 shall not include: (i) advertising materials that have been actually published or 10 publicly disseminated; and (ii) materials that show on their face they have been 11 disseminated to the public. 12 (vii) “Receiving Party” means any Party who receives Discovery 13 Material from a Producing Party. 14 (viii) “Source Code” means computer code, scripts, assembly, binaries, 15 object code, source code listings and descriptions of source code, object code 16 listings and descriptions of object code, data residing in a database or 17 databases, including mask and layout files (e.g. GDS, .sip formats), Hardware 18 Description Language (HDL) or Register Transfer Level (RTL) files that 19 describe the hardware design of any ASIC or other chip, process flow 20 documents and/or recipes, and design rule manuals. 21 3. COMPUTATION OF TIME 22 The computation of any period of time prescribed or allowed by this Order 23 shall be governed by the provisions for computing time set forth in Federal Rule of 24 Civil Procedure 6. 25 4. SCOPE 26 (a) The protections conferred by this Order cover not only Discovery 27 Material governed by this Order as addressed herein, but also any information copied 28 3

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER [PROPOSED], CASE NO. 2:21-CV-04969-GW-AFM Case 2:21-cv-04969-GW-AFM Document 91 Filed 03/14/22 Page 5 of 40 Page ID #:1671

1 or extracted therefrom, as well as all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations 2 thereof, plus testimony, conversations, or presentations by Parties or their counsel in 3 court or in other settings that might reveal Protected Material. 4 (b) Nothing in this Protective Order shall prevent or restrict a Producing 5 Party’s own disclosure or use of its own Protected Material for any purpose, and 6 nothing in this Order shall preclude any Receiving Party from showing Protected 7 Material to an individual who prepared or was involved in the preparation of such 8 Protected Material. 9 (c) Nothing in this Order shall be construed to prejudice any Party’s right 10 to use any Protected Material in court or in any court filing with the consent of the 11 Producing Party or by order of the Court. 12 (d) This Order is without prejudice to the right of any Party to seek further 13 or additional protection of any Discovery Material or to modify this Order in any 14 way, including, without limitation, an order that certain matter not be produced at all. 15 5.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Mediatek Inc. v. NXP Semiconductors N.V., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mediatek-inc-v-nxp-semiconductors-nv-cacd-2022.