Mediate v. State

157 So. 3d 434, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 1614, 2015 WL 477562
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 6, 2015
DocketNo. 5D14-3388
StatusPublished

This text of 157 So. 3d 434 (Mediate v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mediate v. State, 157 So. 3d 434, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 1614, 2015 WL 477562 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Marc Mediate appeals the trial court’s September 9, 2014 and September 12, 2014 orders denying his motion to correct illegal sentence. Inasmuch as Mediate filed his motion to correct illegal sentence during the pendency of his direct appeal, we find the trial court lacked jurisdiction to rule on his motion. See Fla. R. App. P. 3.800(a). We reverse the trial court’s September 9, 2014 and September 12, 2014 orders denying Mediate’s motion to correct illegal sentence and remand with directions to dismiss the motion for lack of jurisdiction. See Walters v. State, 114 So.3d 205 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012). Mediate may refile his motion to correct illegal sentence after the resolution of his direct appeal.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

TORPY, C.J., PALMER and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Walters v. State
114 So. 3d 205 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
157 So. 3d 434, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 1614, 2015 WL 477562, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mediate-v-state-fladistctapp-2015.