Medeiros v. Choy

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Medeiros v. Choy. Read the opinion of the Court — 142 Haw. 233
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided September 26, 2016·No. SCWC-13-0003500·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-13-0003500 26-SEP-2016 09:33 AM

SCWC-13-0003500

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

SAMANTHA THERESALYN MEDEIROS, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellant,

vs.

BRADLEY KONG CHOY,

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-13-0003500; CIV. NO. 11-1-2004)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellee’s Application for Writ of Certiorari filed on August 12, 2016, is hereby accepted and will be scheduled for oral argument. The parties will be notified by the appellate clerk regarding scheduling. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, September 26, 2016. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Medeiros v. Choy, (haw 2016).

Medeiros v. Choy (Medeiros v. Choy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.