Medeiros v. Choy
This text of Medeiros v. Choy (Medeiros v. Choy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-13-0003500 26-SEP-2016 09:33 AM
SCWC-13-0003500
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
SAMANTHA THERESALYN MEDEIROS, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellant,
vs.
BRADLEY KONG CHOY, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellee.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-13-0003500; CIV. NO. 11-1-2004)
ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
Petitioner/Defendant-Appellee’s Application for Writ of
Certiorari filed on August 12, 2016, is hereby accepted and will
be scheduled for oral argument. The parties will be notified by
the appellate clerk regarding scheduling.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, September 26, 2016.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Medeiros v. Choy, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/medeiros-v-choy-haw-2016.