Medberry v. O'Neill

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Medberry v. O'Neill

766 So. 2d 438, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 10988, 2000 WL 1224680

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 30, 2000

DocketNo. 1D00-0038

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 766 So. 2d 438 (Medberry v. O'Neill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Medberry v. O'Neill, 766 So. 2d 438, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 10988, 2000 WL 1224680 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. An order denying indigency status is not appealable. See Brown v. Campion, 757 So.2d 535 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). Additionally, the appellant failed to file a timely notice of appeal on the order denying his mandamus petition, thereby depriving this Court of subject matter jurisdiction. See Metro-Dade Police Dep’t v. Hidalgo, 601 So.2d 1259 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992).

WOLF, DAVIS, and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. An order denying indigency status is not appealable. See Brown v. Campion, 757 So.2d 535 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). Additionally, the appellant failed to file a timely notice of appeal on the order denying his mandamus petition, thereby depriving this Court of subject matter jurisdiction. See Metro-Dade Police Dep’t v. Hidalgo, 601 So.2d 1259 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992).

WOLF, DAVIS, and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., CONCUR.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

766 So. 2d 438, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 10988, 2000 WL 1224680, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/medberry-v-oneill-fladistctapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack