MedAcct, Inc. v. Zinda R. Hitch and PracticeMed, Inc.

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: October 21, 2002
• Docket: 07-02-00324-CV
• Status: Published

Opinion

NO. 07-02-0324-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL E

OCTOBER 21, 2002

______________________________

MEDACCT, INC.,

Appellant

v.

ZINDA R. HITCH AND PRACTICEMED, INC.,

Appellees

_________________________________

FROM THE 72nd DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

NO. 2002-517,482; HON. BLAIR CHERRY, JR., PRESIDING _______________________________

ORDER ON APPELLANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL ________________________________

Before QUINN and REAVIS, JJ., and BOYD, SJ. ⁽¹⁾

MedAcct, Inc., appellant, has moved to dismiss their appeal contending that the parties have settled and reached a compromise. Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(2) and dismiss the appeal. Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's personal request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

Brian Quinn

Do not publish. Justice

1. John T. Boyd, Chief Justice (Ret.), Seventh Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment. Tex. Gov't Code Ann. §75.002(a)(1) (Vernon Supp. 2002).

rMargin m:val="0"/>

NO. 07-10-00062-CR

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A

JANUARY 11, 2011

JAMES F. BELYEU, APPELLANT

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

 FROM THE 364TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

NO. 2008-420,618; HONORABLE BRADLEY S. UNDERWOOD, JUDGE

Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

ON APPELLANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

            Appellant, James F. Belyeu, filed his Notice of Appeal to appeal a judgment of conviction for the offense of aggravated robbery and sentence of 32 years’ imprisonment in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice entered against him in cause number 2008-420618 in the 364th District Court of Lubbock County, Texas. However, appellant has now filed a motion to dismiss his appeal.

            Because the motion meets the requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and this Court has not delivered its decision prior to receiving it, we hereby grant appellant’s motion and dismiss the appeal.   Having dismissed the appeal at appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue.

                                                                                                Mackey K. Hancock

                                                                                                            Justice

Do not publish.