Med-Trans Corporation v. Anthony Lynn, Cheryl Lynn, Michel Van Beers, and Florence Ashley Van Beers

Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)

Med-Trans Corporation v. Anthony Lynn, Cheryl Lynn, Michel Van Beers, and Florence Ashley Van Beers

CourtTexas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)

DecidedJune 4, 2026

Docket02-25-00616-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Med-Trans Corporation v. Anthony Lynn, Cheryl Lynn, Michel Van Beers, and Florence Ashley Van Beers (Med-Trans Corporation v. Anthony Lynn, Cheryl Lynn, Michel Van Beers, and Florence Ashley Van Beers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Med-Trans Corporation v. Anthony Lynn, Cheryl Lynn, Michel Van Beers, and Florence Ashley Van Beers, (Tex. Ct. App. 2026).

Pincite

Opinion

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-25-00616-CV ___________________________

MED-TRANS CORPORATION, Appellant

V.

ANTHONY LYNN, CHERYL LYNN, MICHEL VAN BEERS, AND FLORENCE ASHLEY VAN BEERS, Appellees

On Appeal from the 477th District Court Denton County, Texas Trial Court No. 24-2372-16

Before Kerr, Bassel, and Wallach, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

We previously abated this appeal for settlement purposes. After the time for

settlement elapsed without a motion to dismiss, we reinstated the appeal. We

thereafter received “Appellant’s Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Appeal.” We grant

the unopposed motion to dismiss and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P.

42.1(a)(2)(A), 43.2(f).

Each party must bear its own costs of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d), 43.4.

Per Curiam

Delivered: June 4, 2026

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI