Med Surge Discounters, Inc. v. 171000 Canada, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Med Surge Discounters, Inc. v. 171000 Canada, Inc.

698 So. 2d 640, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 10006, 1997 WL 537024

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 3, 1997

DocketNo. 97-1170

StatusPublished

This text of 698 So. 2d 640 (Med Surge Discounters, Inc. v. 171000 Canada, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Med Surge Discounters, Inc. v. 171000 Canada, Inc., 698 So. 2d 640, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 10006, 1997 WL 537024 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Based on the record, we grant certiorari and strike that portion of the order requiring discovery under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.351; because of the objection, discovery must proceed under rule 1.310. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.351(b). As to the trial court’s determination that petitioners were not entitled to a protective order preventing the release of the requested documents, certiora-ri is denied.

GUNTHER, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Based on the record, we grant certiorari and strike that portion of the order requiring discovery under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.351; because of the objection, discovery must proceed under rule 1.310. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.351(b). As to the trial court’s determination that petitioners were not entitled to a protective order preventing the release of the requested documents, certiora-ri is denied.

GUNTHER, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

698 So. 2d 640, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 10006, 1997 WL 537024, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/med-surge-discounters-inc-v-171000-canada-inc-fladistctapp-1997.