Mecray v. Goldman
147 A. 911, 105 N.J. Eq. 583, 1929 N.J. LEXIS 573
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Ingersoll, and reported in 103 N. J. Eq. 559.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Parker, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, White, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mecray v. Goldman, 147 A. 911, 105 N.J. Eq. 583, 1929 N.J. LEXIS 573 (N.J. 1929).
147 A. 911 (Mecray v. Goldman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sunset Beach Amusement Corp. v. Belk
158 A.2d 35 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1960)
Cooper v. Bergton
87 A.2d 358 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1952)
Mantel v. Landau
34 A.2d 638 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1943)