Mecikalski v. Office of the Attorney General, Division of Criminal Investigation

2 P.3d 1039, 2000 Wyo. LEXIS 110, 2000 WL 426140
CourtWyoming Supreme Court
DecidedApril 21, 2000
Docket99-183
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 2 P.3d 1039 (Mecikalski v. Office of the Attorney General, Division of Criminal Investigation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wyoming Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mecikalski v. Office of the Attorney General, Division of Criminal Investigation, 2 P.3d 1039, 2000 Wyo. LEXIS 110, 2000 WL 426140 (Wyo. 2000).

Opinion

HILL, Justice.

Appellant, Bonnie Mecikalski (Mecikalski), seeks review under W.R.A.P. 12.11 of an order of the district court affirming a finding by the Attorney General, Division of Crimi *1040 nal Investigation (DCI), that her application for a concealed firearm permit be denied. We affirm.

ISSUES

Mecikalski raises these issues in her brief 1 and reply brief;

I. Must the term 'danger to self or others, a statutory term long connoting men- ' tal illness, enacted as a limitation upon concealed weapons rights, be given the same meaning as it has been afforded in the other statutes where it has previously been utilized by the legislature?
II. Under Wyoming's 'shall issue' concealed carry weapons law, what is the legal threshold of evidence, sufficient to sustain the finding of a 'reasonable belief that an applicant for concealed weapon rights constitutes a 'danger to herself or others?
III. Can a finding that a citizen is a 'danger to herself or others' rest solely upon speculation, hearsay, innuendo, and extrastatutory factors, or must it pass objective muster?
[IV]. Where agency action is informal, should not the statutory scheme and its implementation be the sole focus of inquiry on judicial review"?
[V.] Can 'relevant factors' be found outside the four corners of the statute, when applicants for concealed carry permits may be disqualified only on enumerated grounds?
[VL] Can a statutory scheme for permit application and evaluation which takes place 'off the record' be upheld where 'fact finding occurs in the absence of procedure, articulated standards, or express grant of authority?

DCI abbreviates the issue to this single statement:

Was the decision by the Division of Criminal Investigation to deny appellant a concealed weapon permit arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law?

INTRODUCTION

Because the issues raised by Mecikal-ski in this appeal are couched in terms of a "right" to bear arms, we deem it essential to set out a bit of history with respect to the "privilege" to carry a concealed weapon. 2 The Constitution of the United States does not grant a right to bear arms: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." U.S. Const. amend. II. The United States Supreme Court has construed the Second Amendment (in conjunction with the Tenth Amendment) as not affecting the right of a citizen to bear arms. It means no more than that the right may not be infringed by Congress and constrains the federal government but not the several states. U.S. v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542, 553, 23 L.Ed. 588 (1875); Presser v. Illinois, 116 U.S. 252, 265, 6 S.Ct. 580, 29 L.Ed. 615 (1886).

Wyoming has a parallel constitutional provision: "The right of citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and of the state shall not be denied." Wyo. Const. art. 1, § 24. However, contemporaneously with adoption of the Wyoming Constitution, the legislature enacted this statute: "Every person, not being a traveler, who shall wear or carry any dirk, pistol, bowie-knife, dagger, sword-in-cane or any other dangerous or deadly weapon concealed, or who shall carry or wear any such weapon openly, with the intent or avowed purpose of injuring his fellow-man, shall be fined in any sum not exceeding one hundred dollars." 1890 Wyo. Territorial Sess. Laws, Ch. 78 § 96 (lith Legislative Assembly). The statute prohibiting the carrying of concealed weapons has *1041 undergone many revisions over the years, and we shall set out the details of the current version of that statute in a later section of this opinion. We also note at this juncture that we have held that a statute prohibiting the carrying of concealed weapons is constitutional under Wyoming's right to bear arms provision. State v. McAdams, 714 P.2d 1236 (Wyo.1986).

Much like a driver's license, a permit to carry a concealed firearm is a "privilege" and not a "right." See Griess v. Office of the Attorney General, 932 P.2d 734, 739 (Wyo.1997); 94 C.J.S. Weapons § 11 (1956); Glasrud v. City of Laramie, 934 P.2d 1242, 1246 (Wyo.1997); Moreno v. Department of Revenue & Taxation, 755 P.2d 497, 499 (Wyo.1989); Hanson v. State, 673 P.2d 657, 658 (Wyo.1983); - Eastwood v. Wyoming Highway Department, 76 Wyo. 247, 256, 301 P.2d 818, 821 (1956); State v. Mertz, 258 Kan. 745, 907 P.2d 847, 857 (1995); and 7A Am.Jur.2d Automobiles and Highway Traffic § 109 (1997). Just as one may not drive an automobile without a license, Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 81-7-186 (LEXIS 1999), one may not carry a concealed firearm without a permit. Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-8-104(a) (LEXIS 1999). 3

Immediately prior to the adoption of the latest version of the concealed firearm permit statute, the predecessor statute provided:

§ 6-8-104. Wearing or carrying concealed weapons; penalties; exceptions; permits.
(a) A person who wears or carries a concealed deadly weapon is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not more than seven hundred fifty dollars ($750.00), imprisonment in the county jail for not more than six (6) months, or both, unless;
(1) The person is a peace officer; or
(ii) The person possesses a permit under subsection (b) of this section.
(b) A county sheriff may issue permits to travelers, merchant police, private detectives or other persons whose work, vocation or profession requires them to carry a weapon and who the sheriff believes are qualified, taking into account the person's general reputation and previous criminal record. the permits shall be issued for a three (8) year period and may be renewed for successive three (8) year periods. The sheriff may revoke a permit if the conduct of the permitee is contrary to the best interests of the state or its political subdivisions.

Wyo. Stat. § 6-8-104 (1988).

Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-8-104 (LEXIS 1999) currently provides:

§ 6-8-104. Wearing or carrying concealed weapons; penalties; exceptions; permits

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Welch v. Welch
New Mexico Court of Appeals, 2018
King v. Wyoming Division of Criminal Investigation
2004 WY 52 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 P.3d 1039, 2000 Wyo. LEXIS 110, 2000 WL 426140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mecikalski-v-office-of-the-attorney-general-division-of-criminal-wyo-2000.