Mechlowitz Estate

71 Pa. D. & C. 469, 1949 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 241
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County·Decided June 10, 1949·No. no. 1277·Published

Opinion

Hoban, P. J.,

The petition of Scranton Lackawanna Trust Company, guardian of Jacob Mechlowitz, a weak-minded person, asks for allowances to be paid to two adult daughters of Jacob Mechlowitz in the sum of $3,000 each, as dowries, in accordance with the custom of members of the Orthodox Jewish faith, to which all the parties belong.

Jacob Mechlowitz was married to Hattie Mechlowitz on July 10,1917. Mechlowitz entered the military service during World War I and subsequently was adjudged as disabled due to a psychiatric affliction arising out of his war service'. On June 8, 1925, he was admitted as a mental patient to the United States Veterans Administration Facility at Perry Point, Md., and has been and continues to be a patient in that institution since admission. On August 27, 1925, by appropriate proceedings in this court he was adjudged [470] to be a weak-minded person and his wife, Hattie Mechlowitz, was appointed his guardian. On July 22, 1931, Hattie Mechlowitz secured a decree in divorce in this court to September term, 1931, no. 1434. On November 9, 1931, after filing her first and final account as guardian, Hattie Mechlowitz was discharged as guardian of the estate of Jacob Mechlowitz and the Scranton Lackawanna Trust Company was appointed substitute guardian and has since continued to act as such.

Jacob and Hattie Mechlowitz were the parents of two children, Mrs. Hinda K. Freyer, who was born June 6, 1922, and Jean Sarah Mechlowitz, who was born February 12,1926.

From the time of his admission to the veterans’ hospital at Perry Point until 1947 Jacob Mechlowitz’s condition was such that he was allowed periodic furloughs and visited his home and his various relatives in the City of Scranton, both before and after the divorce in 1931. During that period he frequently consulted with the officers of the trust company, his guardian ; his pastor, Rabbi Henry Gutterman, an acknowledged and respected spiritual leader of the Orthodox Jewish community in this county, and he was present at the time his daughter Hinda was married in Scranton to Joseph Freyer in 1942. In the latter years of his visitation he expressed to the officer of the trust company supervising his estate, to Rabbi Gutterman and to his counsel, and subsequently by correspondence, his wishes that he could make provision for his daughters out of his estate for marriage portions or dowries. Since 1947 the condition of his health has been such that he has been unable to leave the hospital.

Analysis of the various accounts filed by the guardians and of the testimony of Frank T. Green, vice president of the Scranton Lackawanna Trust Company, the executive officer supervising his estate, indicates that since the estate came under guardianship in 1925 to [471] the time of the hearing there has come into the hands of the guardians for administration approximately $72,-000, of which amount slightly over $36,000 represents direct payment from the United States Veterans Administration by way of disability compensation and payments on United States Government life insurance, benefits for total disability. Since the majority of Jean Sarah Mechlowitz in February 1947 disability compensation payments have ceased, and the only moneys now included in the income of the estate from the United States Government are monthly payments of $40.63 from Government life insurance. The estate has other income accumulating at the rate of approximately $1,700 per year from disability payments on commercial life insurance and interest on investments. At the date of the hearing the balance in the estate amounted to $20,037.68, represented by $19,000 in United States savings bonds and the balance in cash. Expenses at the present time are negligible, since Mechlowitz is maintained at the hospital at Government expense and the only expenditures called for are the maintenance of a balance to his credit at the hospital of approximately $150 for minor comforts and conveniences.

From 1925 to February 1947 by authorized allowances under supervision of the court the guardians made appropriate provision for the expense of his household to the time of his divorce and for the support and education of his children until their majority.

This petition is based on the theory that the ancient Jewish custom of providing a dowry for daughters of marriageable age ought to be recognized by this court; that the wishes of Jacob Mechlowitz himself in this respect ought to be considered; that since the failure to make such provision for his daughters has been preying on the mind of Jacob Mechlowitz, thus adding to his mental illness, the allowance of the proposed dowries might have a beneficial therapeutic effect, and [472] that under present medical opinion there appears no probable chance of improvement in the mental condition of Jacob Mechlowitz such as would warrant his release from the hospital and require recourse to the estate for his support. Further, that the proposed payments would go to his natural heirs and could in no way impair the estate to the disadvantage of prospective beneficiaries.

All appropriate parties having an interest by relation to Jacob Mechlowitz have received a notice of these proceedings, and in accordance with the Act of April 24, 1929, P. L. 647, 20 PS §788, the United States Veterans Administration also received notice. The Veterans Administration has filed an answer in which it objects to the proposed allowance and questions its propriety because of the ample provision made for the support of the daughters during their minority and the possibility that the veteran may have to depend on this fund for his support. It is conceded that this court has proper jurisdiction over the entire fund subject to its administration and that approval of the guardian’s distribution is entirely within the discretion of the court. The Veterans Administration is charged by law and regulation with the protection of the interest of incompetent veterans and quite properly files its answer in this case so that the court may be fully informed of all conditions which ought to enter into its consideration in deciding the matter.

It is apparent from an inspection of the figures cited above that approximately one half of the estate came from direct payments by the Government to the veteran because of his war incurred disability, and if there should be any point to the matter it could be conceded that such allowance as is here proposed could be taken from the portion of the estate derived from other than Government sources. However, in view of the decision in Stein’s Case, 118 Pa. Superior Ct. 549, this consid[473] eration is somewhat immaterial, as without question the court has control over the administration of the estate from whatever source derived.

Our only consideration, therefore, must he as to whether or not the proposed payment is in the interest of the incompetent person, since obviously the bare legal obligation of supporting his children ceased when they attained their majority.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mechlowitz Estate, 71 Pa. D. & C. 469, 1949 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 241 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1949).

71 Pa. D. & C. 469 (Mechlowitz Estate) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stein's Case
180 A. 577 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1935)