Mechlow v. Vocelle Moaba v. Vocelle

Supreme Court of Florida

Mechlow v. Vocelle Moaba v. Vocelle

22 So. 2d 631, 156 Fla. 115, 1945 Fla. LEXIS 767

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedJune 29, 1945

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 22 So. 2d 631 (Mechlow v. Vocelle Moaba v. Vocelle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mechlow v. Vocelle Moaba v. Vocelle, 22 So. 2d 631, 156 Fla. 115, 1945 Fla. LEXIS 767 (Fla. 1945).

Pincite

Opinion

*116 PER CURIAM:

Both these cases involve the question of whether or not Ordinance No. 1526 as amended by Ordinance No. 2735, as further amended by Ordinance No. 2161, authorizes the City of Miami to limit the number of liquor distribution places within the City in view of the provisions of the State Beverage Act.

In our view, this question was answered by us in William D. Singer, et al., v. Scarborough, et al., 20 So. (2nd) 126, decided December 5, 1944. So the motion for peremptory writ of mandamus notwithstanding the return is granted on authority of the last cited case. See also City of Miami v. Paul Kichinko, decided this date.

It is so ordered.

CHAPMAN, C. J., TERRELL, BUFORD, ADAMS and SEBRING, JJ., concur. BROWN and THOMAS, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI