Mechling v. Kittanning Bridge Co.
This text of 1 Grant 416 (Mechling v. Kittanning Bridge Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of the court was delivered by
— Private citizens have no right of action^ either in law or equity, for the suppression of a public nuisance, unless on averring and proving some special damage to themselves, and in this case no such damage is thus shown, and this bill cannot be sustained. For a nuisance that is merely a public wroBg, only a [420]*420public action can be brought, and that must be done by the proper public functionaries.
This principle decides this case, and it is not proper for us to go further, now, and express any opinion upon the rights of the defendants, or of the acts done by them, in a case brought by parties who show no right to call them to account for their doings.
Bill dismissed at the cost of plaintiffs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Grant 416, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mechling-v-kittanning-bridge-co-pa-1856.