Mechling v. Kittanning Bridge Co.

1 Grant 416
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 1, 1856·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Lowrie, J.

— Private citizens have no right of action^ either in law or equity, for the suppression of a public nuisance, unless on averring and proving some special damage to themselves, and in this case no such damage is thus shown, and this bill cannot be sustained. For a nuisance that is merely a public wroBg, only a [420]*420public action can be brought, and that must be done by the proper public functionaries.

This principle decides this case, and it is not proper for us to go further, now, and express any opinion upon the rights of the defendants, or of the acts done by them, in a case brought by parties who show no right to call them to account for their doings.

Bill dismissed at the cost of plaintiffs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mechling v. Kittanning Bridge Co., 1 Grant 416 (Pa. 1856).

1 Grant 416 (Mechling v. Kittanning Bridge Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Alexander v. Wilkes-Barre Anthracite Coal Co.
98 A. 794 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1916)
Rhymer v. Fretz
55 A. 959 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1903)
City of Allegheny v. Zimmerman
95 Pa. 287 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1880)
City of Philadelphia v. Collins
68 Pa. 106 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1871)
Philadelphia & Erie Railroad v. Catawissa Railroad
53 Pa. 20 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1866)