Mechanics' & Traders' Insurance v. Smith
This text of 79 Miss. 142 (Mechanics' & Traders' Insurance v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
A week after the fire, with full knowledge by the insurance company, through its special agent and adjuster, Mr. Alexander, of the existence of the mortgage, it received, through its local agent, Mr. Russell, the premium on the policy, and held it. This fact carries the whole case shown by the record for the assignee of the insured, because it was a waiver of its defenses. See the concluding paragraph of the opinion in Assurance Co. v. Phelps, 77 Miss., 660 (27 So., 745). And see Mitchell v. Insurance Co., 72 Miss., 53 (18 So., 86); Insurance Co. v. Freeman, 19 Tex. Civ. App., 632 (47 S. W., 1025); American Fire Ins. Co. v. First Nat. Bank of Vicksburg, 73 Miss., 470 (18 So., 931). Tender of this premium back after trial commenced is too late.
We are ready to decide the other questions presented, but it is unnecessary to do so.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
79 Miss. 142, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mechanics-traders-insurance-v-smith-miss-1901.