Mechanics & Traders Bank v. Seitz Bros.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Mechanics & Traders Bank v. Seitz Bros.

26 A. 209, 155 Pa. 191, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1219

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mechanics & Traders Bank v. Seitz Bros.. Read the opinion of the Court — 150 Pa. 632 →

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 20, 1893·No. Appeal, No. 103·Published

Opinion

Pee Cueiam,

This case appears to have been tried in accordance with the principles enunciated by this court in an opinion by our brother Williams when it was here before about one year ago : Bank v. Seitz Bros., 150 Pa. 632. An examination of the record has failed to convince us that there is any error in the rulings of the learned judge that requires a reversal of the judgment. In view of what is said in the opinion referred to, comment on the several specifications of error is unnecessary. Neither of them is sustained.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cueiam,

This case appears to have been tried in accordance with the principles enunciated by this court in an opinion by our brother Williams when it was here before about one year ago : Bank v. Seitz Bros., 150 Pa. 632. An examination of the record has failed to convince us that there is any error in the rulings of the learned judge that requires a reversal of the judgment. In view of what is said in the opinion referred to, comment on the several specifications of error is unnecessary. Neither of them is sustained.

Judgment affirmed.

Mechanics & Traders Bank v. Seitz Bros., 26 A. 209, 155 Pa. 191, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1219 (Pa. 1893).

Pincite

26 A. 209 (Mechanics & Traders Bank v. Seitz Bros.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related