Mechanics & Traders Bank v. Seitz Bros.
This text of 26 A. 209 (Mechanics & Traders Bank v. Seitz Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case appears to have been tried in accordance with the principles enunciated by this court in an opinion by our brother Williams when it was here before about one year ago : Bank v. Seitz Bros., 150 Pa. 632. An examination of the record has failed to convince us that there is any error in the rulings of the learned judge that requires a reversal of the judgment. In view of what is said in the opinion referred to, comment on the several specifications of error is unnecessary. Neither of them is sustained.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
26 A. 209, 155 Pa. 191, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mechanics-traders-bank-v-seitz-bros-pa-1893.