Mechanic's Lien v. 478 Cherry Street

27 Misc. 682, 58 N.Y.S. 665
New York Supreme Court·Decided June 15, 1899·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Gildersleeve, J.

The owner of ^ the property discharged a mechanic’s lien by the payment of money into court, in accordance with the provisions of the Lien Law (chap. 418, Laws of 1897).

He Mow. asks leave to substitute a bond in place of the money. The statute contains no provision for such a proceeding, and I am unable to find any precedent therefor. It seems to me that the court is without jurisdiction to -make the order asked for.

Motion denied. Ro costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mechanic's Lien v. 478 Cherry Street, 27 Misc. 682, 58 N.Y.S. 665 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1899).

27 Misc. 682 (Mechanic's Lien v. 478 Cherry Street) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Tumac Realty Corp.
203 Misc. 649 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1952)