Mechanics' Building Ass'n v. Stevens
This text of 5 Duer 676 (Mechanics' Building Ass'n v. Stevens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
held, that this is not a defence of which the defendants can avail themselves; that, admitting that the association was a moneyed corporation, subject, as such, to the provisions of the [677]*677Revised Statutes, and that, by its failure to comply with those provisions, it had forfeited its charter, it belonged to the state alone, by a proceeding instituted for that purpose, to enforce the forfeiture, and that the association, until by a judicial sentence its charter was declared to be void, was a corporation de facto, and that no private person, more especially no person dealing with it, could be permitted to say that it was not also a corporation de jure. (Triton Ins. Co. v. McGarian, 4 Denio, 392; Brower v. Appleby, 1 Sand. S. C. R. 107; Palmer v. Lawrence, 3 id. 161, 170.)
Judgment for plaintiff, directing salé of mortgage and premises.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 Duer 676, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mechanics-building-assn-v-stevens-nysuperctnyc-1856.