Mecca v. George

225 A.D. 784

Opinion

Judgment modified by affowing certain interest claimed by defendant on two items and as so modified affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Certain findings of fact and one conclusion of law modified. All concur. Present — Clark, Crouch, Taylor, Sawyer and Edgcomb, JJ. [131 Misc. 759.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mecca v. George, 225 A.D. 784 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1928).

225 A.D. 784 (Mecca v. George) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McDermott v. Rossney Contracting Corp.
131 Misc. 759 (New York Supreme Court, 1928)