Mecartney v. City of Chicago

211 Ill. App. 403
Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided June 10, 1918·No. Gen. No. 23,935·Published

Opinion

Mr. Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Limitation of actions, § 121* — when request for leave to file plea is too late. Refusal to permit the filing of a plea setting up the statute of limitations is not error where leave to file it is first sought after trial and review and remandment by the Supremé Court. 3. Limitation of actions, § 106* — when refusal to allow filing of plea is not error. Refusal to permit the filing of a plea setting up the statute of limitations is not error where, even if the plea should be sustained, it would not end the litigation, but would leave open to plaintiff the remedy of assumpsit or of mandamus. 4. Appeat. and ebbob, § 1725* — what matters deemed adjudicated on former appeal. The rule is that not only those matters which are presented for determination, but also those which could have been presented, shall be deemed to have been adjudicated by the decision of the Supreme Court on a former appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mecartney v. City of Chicago, 211 Ill. App. 403 (Ill. Ct. App. 1918).

211 Ill. App. 403 (Mecartney v. City of Chicago) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.