Mears v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Mears v. State

715 So. 2d 338, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 10764, 1998 WL 455235

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 7, 1998

DocketNo. 96-4878

StatusPublished

This text of 715 So. 2d 338 (Mears v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mears v. State, 715 So. 2d 338, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 10764, 1998 WL 455235 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Haying reviewed the record on this appeal, and having considered the arguments contained in the briefs, we conclude that the only issue properly before us is moot. See Godwin v. State, 593 So.2d 211, 212 (Fla.1992) (“An issue is moot when the controversy has been so fully resolved that a judicial determination can have no actual effect”). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

MINER and WEBSTER, JJ. and SMITH, LARRY G., Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Haying reviewed the record on this appeal, and having considered the arguments contained in the briefs, we conclude that the only issue properly before us is moot. See Godwin v. State, 593 So.2d 211, 212 (Fla.1992) (“An issue is moot when the controversy has been so fully resolved that a judicial determination can have no actual effect”). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

MINER and WEBSTER, JJ. and SMITH, LARRY G., Senior Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

715 So. 2d 338, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 10764, 1998 WL 455235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mears-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack