Mears v. Sports Information Enterprises Limited, Inc.

664 So. 2d 8, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 10179, 1995 WL 567372
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 27, 1995
Docket95-88
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 664 So. 2d 8 (Mears v. Sports Information Enterprises Limited, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mears v. Sports Information Enterprises Limited, Inc., 664 So. 2d 8, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 10179, 1995 WL 567372 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

664 So.2d 8 (1995)

Betty S. MEARS, Appellant,
v.
SPORTS INFORMATION ENTERPRISES LIMITED, INC., et al., Appellees.

No. 95-88.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

September 27, 1995.

Robin L. Kozin, Miami, for appellant.

John D. Maher, Tallahassee, for appellee.

Before NESBITT, BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The claimant appeals an adverse order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission denying her benefits. She claims that an appeals referee ignored competent and substantial evidence which demonstrates she left her employment for causes attributable to her employer. The referee's finding was affirmed by the full commission.

Claimant was a supervisor of a telephone talk service at the time that heavy competition developed from a competing company. For this reason, business declined and she was informed that her pay, as well as that of other supervisors, would accordingly be decreased and hours adjusted. Shortly before she took a planned vacation, she was asked to train an assistant supervisor. When she *9 returned, she found that she had received another decline in pay. She became anxiety ridden and made inquiry about her future with the company. She received no definitive answer. At one point, she told her supervisor that she would be quitting her job. Soon thereafter, she did just that. Her argument here is that she had a reasonable basis to believe that her employer no longer valued her as a supervisor. The employer's representatives flatly testified to the contrary. The appeal referee's finding that the claimant voluntarily left her employment without good cause attributable to her employer is supported by the record. This is the very type of case in which the appeals referee's assessment of weight and credibility carries the day for one party or the other. Heifetz v. Department of Bus. Reg., 475 So.2d 1277 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Spence v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission
954 So. 2d 1249 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Torres v. Jones
717 So. 2d 135 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
664 So. 2d 8, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 10179, 1995 WL 567372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mears-v-sports-information-enterprises-limited-inc-fladistctapp-1995.