Meany v. Newell

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Meany v. Newell

359 N.W.2d 571, 1984 Minn. LEXIS 1570

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Meany v. Newell. Read the opinion of the Court — 1985 Minn. LEXIS 1063 →

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided December 20, 1984·No. No. C7-84-523·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of Cardinal IG Company for further review of the decision of the Court of Appeals be, and the same is, granted. Briefs shall be filed in the quantity, form and within the time limitations contained in Minn.R.Civ.App.P. 131 and 132. Counsel will be notified at a later date of the time for argument before this court. No requests for extensions of time for the filing of briefs will be entertained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of Cardinal IG Company for further review of the decision of the Court of Appeals be, and the same is, granted. Briefs shall be filed in the quantity, form and within the time limitations contained in Minn.R.Civ.App.P. 131 and 132. Counsel will be notified at a later date of the time for argument before this court. No requests for extensions of time for the filing of briefs will be entertained.

Meany v. Newell, 359 N.W.2d 571, 1984 Minn. LEXIS 1570 (Mich. 1984).

Pincite

359 N.W.2d 571 (Meany v. Newell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.