Means v. UNUM Life Insurance Co. of America
This text of 115 F. App'x 301 (Means v. UNUM Life Insurance Co. of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Shaundra Means appeals the district court’s judgment, not arguing error in the [302]*302merits of that disposition, but only error in the court’s setting aside a default judgment in her favor. The court did not err in doing so, for the reasons given in its order of April 23, 2003.
AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
115 F. App'x 301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/means-v-unum-life-insurance-co-of-america-ca5-2004.