Means v. State

27 So. 3d 691, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 20381, 2009 WL 5125081
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 30, 2009·No. 3D08-1128·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The only arguable error presented on this appeal from a second degree murder conviction, which concerns the allegedly improper admission of “expert” testimony by a crime scene investigator, was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. See § 924.33, Fla. Stat. (2009); State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Means v. State, 27 So. 3d 691, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 20381, 2009 WL 5125081 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

27 So. 3d 691 (Means v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. DiGuilio
491 So. 2d 1129 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)