Means v. Burks

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Means v. Burks

314 S.W.2d 518, 1958 Ky. LEXIS 294

DecidedJune 13, 1958

StatusPublished

This text of 314 S.W.2d 518 (Means v. Burks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Means v. Burks, 314 S.W.2d 518, 1958 Ky. LEXIS 294 (Ky. Ct. App. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

J. A. Burks and J. A. Burks, Jr., recovered judgment against Scott Means, Jr., in the sum of $1,437.10. The evidence heard by the trial judge without a jury is in conflict as to whether the note on which the amount was due was executed by the parties as participants in a joint venture or by appellant as principal and ap-pellees, as sureties. There is sufficient evidence to sustain the finding that appellees were sureties. All questions presented on appeal have been considered and no prejudicial error has been found.

The motion for an appeal is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

J. A. Burks and J. A. Burks, Jr., recovered judgment against Scott Means, Jr., in the sum of $1,437.10. The evidence heard by the trial judge without a jury is in conflict as to whether the note on which the amount was due was executed by the parties as participants in a joint venture or by appellant as principal and ap-pellees, as sureties. There is sufficient evidence to sustain the finding that appellees were sureties. All questions presented on appeal have been considered and no prejudicial error has been found.

The motion for an appeal is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

314 S.W.2d 518, 1958 Ky. LEXIS 294, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/means-v-burks-kyctapp-1958.