Meaney v. Kennedy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Meaney v. Kennedy

10 A.D.2d 612, 200 N.Y.S.2d 324, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11800

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 9, 1960·Published

Opinion

Motion granted to the extent of permitting the appeal to be heard on the original record, without printing the same, and upon typewritten or mimeographed petitioner’s points, on condition that the petitioner serves one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed petitioner’s points on the Corporation Counsel of the City of New York and files 6 copies of the typewritten petitioner’s points, or 19 mimeographed copies thereof, together with the original record, with this court on or before March 1, 1960, with notice of argument for the April 1960 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, M. M. Frank and Valente, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion granted to the extent of permitting the appeal to be heard on the original record, without printing the same, and upon typewritten or mimeographed petitioner’s points, on condition that the petitioner serves one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed petitioner’s points on the Corporation Counsel of the City of New York and files 6 copies of the typewritten petitioner’s points, or 19 mimeographed copies thereof, together with the original record, with this court on or before March 1, 1960, with notice of argument for the April 1960 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, M. M. Frank and Valente, JJ.

Meaney v. Kennedy, 10 A.D.2d 612, 200 N.Y.S.2d 324, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11800 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

10 A.D.2d 612 (Meaney v. Kennedy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.