Meana v. U.S. Bank, N.A.

245 So. 3d 1003
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 16, 2018
DocketNo. 3D17–2191
StatusPublished

This text of 245 So. 3d 1003 (Meana v. U.S. Bank, N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Meana v. U.S. Bank, N.A., 245 So. 3d 1003 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Based upon Appellee's concession of error solely as to the issue that a hearing was required before entry of final judgment, we dismiss the appeal and remand with instructions to vacate the final judgment of foreclosure rendered on September 28, 2017 and to conduct a hearing consistent with our holding in Chiu v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 43 Florida Law Weekly D672, 242 So.3d 461, 2018 WL 1516829 (Fla. 3d DCA March 28, 2018) (finding that the trial court committed fundamental error in entering final summary judgment before conducting a hearing on Wells Fargo's motion for summary judgment).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chiu v. Wells Fargo Bank
242 So. 3d 461 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
245 So. 3d 1003, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meana-v-us-bank-na-fladistctapp-2018.