Meana v. U.S. Bank
This text of Meana v. U.S. Bank (Meana v. U.S. Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed May 16, 2018. ________________
No. 3D17-2191 Lower Tribunal No. 15-4712 ________________
Daniel Meana, Appellant,
vs.
U.S. Bank, N.A., as trustee, etc., Appellee.
An appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jose M. Rodriguez, Judge.
Dennis A. Donet, P.A., and Dennis A. Donet, for appellant.
Pearson Bitman LLP, and Allison Morat (Maitland), for appellee.
Before SUAREZ, LAGOA, and LINDSEY, JJ.
CONFESSION OF ERROR
PER CURIAM.
Based upon Appellee’s concession of error solely as to the issue that a
hearing was required before entry of final judgment, we dismiss the appeal and remand with instructions to vacate the final judgment of foreclosure rendered on
September 28, 2017 and to conduct a hearing consistent with our holding in Chiu
v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 43 Florida Law Weekly D672 (Fla. 3d DCA March 28,
2018) (finding that the trial court committed fundamental error in entering final
summary judgment before conducting a hearing on Wells Fargo’s motion for
summary judgment).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Meana v. U.S. Bank, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meana-v-us-bank-fladistctapp-2018.