Meagher v. Schussler

118 N.W. 664, 106 Minn. 539, 1908 Minn. LEXIS 779
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedDecember 11, 1908
DocketNos. 15,783—(103)
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 118 N.W. 664 (Meagher v. Schussler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Meagher v. Schussler, 118 N.W. 664, 106 Minn. 539, 1908 Minn. LEXIS 779 (Mich. 1908).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an- appeal from an order discharging a restraining order and denying an application for a temporary injunction to restrain a school district from issuing bonds because of certain alleged irregularities in the election. An order granting, refusing, or dissolving a temporary injunction pendente lite rests in judicial discretion, and unless there has been an abuse of such discretion the court will not interfere. Gorton v. Town of Forest City, 67 Minn. 36, 69 N. W. 478.

The discretion was not abused in this instance, and the order is therefore affirmed.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Minneapolis Gaslight Co. v. City of Minneapolis
143 N.W. 728 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
118 N.W. 664, 106 Minn. 539, 1908 Minn. LEXIS 779, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meagher-v-schussler-minn-1908.