Meagher v. Bachelder

6 Mass. 444
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided May 15, 1810·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

But the Court denied the motion, and at the same time observed that this was a very improper mode of pleading; and that if the plaintiff had demurred, he must have had judgment. Defendants cannot sever in their pleas, except in actions founded on a tort. If, in this case, one defendant only had appeared, he must have pleaded that the three defendants did not promise, &c.

Orr took nothing by his motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Meagher v. Bachelder, 6 Mass. 444 (Mass. 1810).

6 Mass. 444 (Meagher v. Bachelder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Moore v. Knowles
65 Me. 493 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1876)
Prescott v. Bartlett
43 N.H. 298 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1861)
Austin v. Feland
8 Mo. 309 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1843)
Mason v. Waite
18 Mass. 452 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1823)