Meagher v. Bachelder
6 Mass. 444
Opinion
But the Court denied the motion, and at the same time observed that this was a very improper mode of pleading; and that if the plaintiff had demurred, he must have had judgment. Defendants cannot sever in their pleas, except in actions founded on a tort. If, in this case, one defendant only had appeared, he must have pleaded that the three defendants did not promise, &c.
Orr took nothing by his motion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Meagher v. Bachelder, 6 Mass. 444 (Mass. 1810).
6 Mass. 444 (Meagher v. Bachelder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Moore v. Knowles
65 Me. 493 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1876)
Prescott v. Bartlett
43 N.H. 298 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1861)
Austin v. Feland
8 Mo. 309 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1843)
Mason v. Waite
18 Mass. 452 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1823)